Pen Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 2602-4780   |  e-ISSN: 2602-4489

Original article | International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 2019, Vol. 3(4) 70-81

Argumentation Practices in Science Education

Eylem Yalçınkaya Önder & Esin Pekmez

pp. 70 - 81   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2019.226.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2001-22-0004

Published online: January 23, 2020  |   Number of Views: 11  |  Number of Download: 45


Abstract

This study aimed to teach the method of argumentation concept to pre-service teachers and to determine the change in argumentation quality of them through activities involving socio-scientific issues and science concepts. 48 pre-service teachers from a public university participated in this study. Convenience sampling technique was used as a non-random sampling method for forming the study groups. The pre-service teachers forming the working group had not received a course or training about argumentation in their formal education program before the current study. The activities of the study were conducted before and after instructed them about the Toulmin Argument Pattern (TAP) and argumentation concepts. Throughout the activities, pre-service teachers found an opportunity to engage in groups and exchange ideas with one another. Data were collected through both written and verbal arguments. The written arguments containing the common views/opinions of the group were taken from each group of students. Verbal arguments were also recorded as video besides to written arguments. The frequency of use of the elements of the students in the TAP was also presented in the study. It is determined that there is no substantial change in the written and verbal argument quality of the students.

Keywords: Pre-service teachers, Argumentation, Written Arguments, Oral Arguments


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Onder, E.Y. & Pekmez, E. (2019). Argumentation Practices in Science Education . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 3(4), 70-81. doi: 10.29329/ijiape.2019.226.1

Harvard
Onder, E. and Pekmez, E. (2019). Argumentation Practices in Science Education . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 3(4), pp. 70-81.

Chicago 16th edition
Onder, Eylem Yalcinkaya and Esin Pekmez (2019). "Argumentation Practices in Science Education ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 3 (4):70-81. doi:10.29329/ijiape.2019.226.1.

References
  1. Aydeniz, M., & Gürçay, D. (2013). Assessing quality of pre-service physics teachers’ written arguments. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(3), 269-287, DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2013.834883 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aydeniz, M., Pabuccu, A., Cetin, P. S., ve Kaya, E. (2012). Impact of argumentation on college students’ conceptual understanding of properties and behaviors of gases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1303–1324. [Google Scholar]
  3. Çetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 1-20, DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2013.850071 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837-861. [Google Scholar]
  5. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne., J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–33. [Google Scholar]
  6. Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaya, E., Erduran, S., & Çetin, P. S. (2012). Discourse, argumentation, and science lessons: match or mismatch in high school students' perceptions and understanding?. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 2(3), 1-32. [Google Scholar]
  8. Martín-Gámez, C. & Erduran, S. (2018).Understanding argumentation about socio-scientific issues on energy: a quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in Spain. Research in Science & Technological Education, DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2018.1427568 [Google Scholar]
  9. McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on k-12 teachers. Science Education, 97, 937-972. [Google Scholar]
  10. Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of science education, 21(5), 553-576. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaya, E. (2013). Argumentation Practices in Classroom: Pre-service teachers' conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1139-1158, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.770935 [Google Scholar]
  12. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Özdem, Y., Cakiroglu, J.,Ertepinar, H., & Erduran. S. (2013). The Nature of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-Oriented Laboratory Context. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2559–2586. [Google Scholar]
  14. Özdem-Yilmaz, Y., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Erduran, S. (2017). The pedagogy of argumentation in science education: science teachers’ instructional practices, International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1443-1464, DOI:10.1080/09500693.2017.1336807 [Google Scholar]
  15. Simon, S. (2008). Using Toulmin’s argument pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science.  International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(3), 277-289. [Google Scholar]
  16. Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation; research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–60. [Google Scholar]
  17. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10  [Google Scholar]
  19. students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. [Google Scholar]