International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education
Abbreviation: IJIAPE | ISSN (Online): 2602-4489 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiape

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education Volume 10 (2026)

An Inquiry-Based Approach to Improving Mathematical Literacy in Gifted Students

Duygu Alyeşil Kabakci, Süha Yılmaz

pp. 1 - 27   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2026.1443.2

Publish Date: June 08, 2026  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0

PDF Download

Abstract

Mathematical literacy encompasses students' abilities to formulate mathematical problems encountered in real-life contexts, use mathematics in the problem-solving process, and interpret the results obtained. Furthermore, it is considered a multifaceted skill area involving higher-order cognitive processes that support an individual's ability to apply mathematics in various situations. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of inquiry-based mathematics teaching on the development of mathematics literacy performance in gifted Year 7 students. The research was derived from a doctoral thesis conducted by the first author under the supervision of the second author. The research was conducted using a teaching experiment design within the scope of qualitative methods. The study group consisted of eight gifted students selected through criterion sampling. The teaching process was structured based on the guided inquiry approach and used PISA-style open-ended problems that supported active student participation. Data were collected through pre-, mid-, and post-clinical interviews and audio recordings. The clinical interviews were analysed using content analysis, while the teaching experiment session data were analysed using descriptive analysis. The findings revealed that inquiry-based teaching improved students' mathematical literacy performance and led to significant developments in their ability to understand problems and relate data and concepts within the formulation process.

Keywords: Mathematical Literacy, PISA, Inquiry-Based Teaching, Gifted Student

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Kabakci, D.A., & Yilmaz, S. (2026). An Inquiry-Based Approach to Improving Mathematical Literacy in Gifted Students. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 10(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2026.1443.2

Harvard
Kabakci, D. and Yilmaz, S. (2026). An Inquiry-Based Approach to Improving Mathematical Literacy in Gifted Students. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 10(1), pp. 1-27.

Chicago 16th edition
Kabakci, Duygu Alyesil and Suha Yilmaz (2026). "An Inquiry-Based Approach to Improving Mathematical Literacy in Gifted Students". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 10 (1):1-27. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2026.1443.2
References
  1. Akıllı, E. (2020). Matematik okuryazarlık eğitiminin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinde akademik başarıya ve epistemolojik inanç düzeyine etkisi (Master’s thesis, Bursa Uludağ University). [Google Scholar]
  2. Altun, M. (2022). Çift odaklı öğretim modeli ile matematik okuryazarlığı düzeyinin artırılması. Stüdyo Star Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  3. Altun, M., Kozaklı Ülger, T., & Bozkurt, I. (2022). Matematik okuryazarlığı el kitabı (2nd ed.). Ekin Basım Yayın. [Google Scholar]
  4. Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bildiren, A. (2018). Üstün yetenekli çocuklar. Doğan Kitap. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bozkurt, I. (2019). Matematik okuryazarlığı bağlamında öğrencilerin yaşadığı güçlüklerin incelenmesi (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). [Google Scholar]
  8. Cross, T. L. (2011). On the social and emotional lives of gifted children (4th ed.). Prufrock Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Demirci, G. (2018). Matematiksel modelleme yönteminin matematik okuryazarlığına etkisi (Master’s thesis, Atatürk University). [Google Scholar]
  10. Doz, I. (2025). The impact of inquiry-based learning on students’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10417-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Erol, M. (2015). Modelleme etkinliklerinin 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematiksel okuryazarlıkları ve inançları üzerine etkisi (Doctoral dissertation, Balıkesir University). [Google Scholar]
  12. Friesen, S., & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-based learning: A review of the research literature. Galileo Educational Network. https://galileo.org/focus-on-inquiry-lit-review.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Güler, H. K. (2013). Türk öğrencilerin PISA’da karşılaştıkları güçlüklerin analizi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(2), 501–522. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uefad/article/173591 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Karaduman, B., Arslan, Ç., Tapan Broutın, M. S., & Ezentaş, R. (2023). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin resim, müzik ve sayısal yeteneklerine göre matematiksel okuryazarlık problemlerini çözüm süreçlerinin irdelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 10(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.33907/turkjes.1150966 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin, D. J. (2009). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach. Delmar. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mayan, T. (2019). Problem çözme ve problem kurma uygulamalarının ortaokul 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik okuryazarlığına etkisinin incelenmesi (Master’s thesis, Dokuz Eylül University). [Google Scholar]
  20. Ministry of National Education. (2022). BİLSEM primary school mathematics curriculum. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2022_03/28171823_BILSEM_ILKOGRETIM_MATEMATIK_ALANI.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. Ministry of National Education. (2024). PISA 2022 Türkiye report [Report]. https://pisa.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2024_03/21120745_26152640_pisa2022_rapor.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. Ministry of National Education. (2024a). Middle school mathematics curriculum (Grades 5–8): Türkiye Century Maarif Model. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/program/2024programmat5678Onayli.pdf [Google Scholar]
  23. Ministry of National Education. (2024b). Learning-teaching experiences: Türkiye Century Maarif Model. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/ogrenme-ogretme-yasantilari [Google Scholar]
  24. OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science and global competence. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 mathematics framework (Draft). https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/files/PISA%202022%20Mathematics%20Framework%20Draft.pdf [Google Scholar]
  27. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I & II): Country notes – Türkiye. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/turkiye_d67e6c05-en.html [Google Scholar]
  28. Polat, M., & Turhan, N. S. (2022). PISA testlerinde matematik okuryazarlığı ile matematik başarısı arasındaki ilişkiye ilişkin bir meta-analiz çalışması. Uluslararası Çevrimiçi Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 9(2), 661–676. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1343127.pdf [Google Scholar]
  29. Pugalee, D. K. (1999). Constructing a model of mathematical literacy. The Clearing House, 73(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659909599606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sheffield, L. J. (2003). Extending the challenge in mathematics: Developing mathematical promise in K–8 students. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3503_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Galbraith, P. (2013). Research into mathematical modelling and problem solving. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling (pp. 237–248). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Taşkın, E. (2017). Altıncı sınıf öğrencilerine verilen matematik okuryazarlığı eğitiminin öğrencilerin matematik okuryazarlığı başarısına etkisi (Master’s thesis, Bursa Uludağ University). [Google Scholar]
  35. Uysal, E. (2009). İlköğretim sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik okuryazarlık düzeyleri (Master’s thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University). [Google Scholar]
  36. Ülger, T. K. (2021). Matematik okuryazarlık yeterliklerinin gelişimine dayalı bir modüler programın tasarlanması, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). [Google Scholar]
  37. Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/ [Google Scholar]
  38. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri) (12th ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yıldız, H., & Ezentaş, R. (2020). Yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik okuryazarlığı sorularının çözümünde karşılaştıkları zorlukların incelenmesi. Fen Matematik Girişimcilik ve Teknoloji Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(2), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.801665 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
Meta
Volume 10 (2026)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 10 Issue 1

January 2026

All Manuscript
Copyright © 2026 International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education.
Pen Academic Publishing®
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website have been created using the BOQ™ - eJournal Management System.
Pen Academic Publishing General Publication Policy: