International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education
Abbreviation: IJIAPE | ISSN (Print): 2602-4780 | ISSN (Online): 2602-4489 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiape

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 2022, Vol. 6(2) 96-117

Contribution of Mobile Design Applications to Creativity in Visual Arts Education

Sevda Ceylan-Dadakoğlu, Meli̇ke Bakar-Fındıkçı & Atilla Özdemir

pp. 96 - 117   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2022.456.2

Published online: July 06, 2022  |   Number of Views: 132  |  Number of Download: 262

Download PDF

Abstract

The unstoppable progress of technology affects all aspects of our lives, including education. Today, researchers are looking to include digital applications and virtual environments in education and instruction processes. This research concerns using digital tools called mobile design applications in visual arts education courses. This research aims to reveal the effect of mobile design applications in the visual arts education course on the creativity of secondary school students. Data were collected through Creativity Level Analytical Rubric (CLAR), which the researchers developed. The study sample consisted of 38 students studying in the 11th grade of a public school in Ankara and was selected randomly. The study lasted 14 weeks. The designs made by the participants using mobile design applications were evaluated using CLAR by three experts who had at least Ph.D. education in the field of visual arts. Obtained scores were interpreted, and as a result, it was concluded that mobile design applications positively affect the participants' creativity.

Keywords: Creativity, Mobile Design Applications, Rubric, Visual Arts Education

How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Ceylan-Dadakoglu, S., Bakar-Findikci, M. & Ozdemir, A. (2022). Contribution of Mobile Design Applications to Creativity in Visual Arts Education . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 6(2), 96-117. doi: 10.29329/ijiape.2022.456.2

Harvard
Ceylan-Dadakoglu, S., Bakar-Findikci, M. and Ozdemir, A. (2022). Contribution of Mobile Design Applications to Creativity in Visual Arts Education . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 6(2), pp. 96-117.

Chicago 16th edition
Ceylan-Dadakoglu, Sevda, Meli̇ke Bakar-Findikci and Atilla Ozdemir (2022). "Contribution of Mobile Design Applications to Creativity in Visual Arts Education ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 6 (2):96-117. doi:10.29329/ijiape.2022.456.2.
References
  1. Al Hashimi, S., Mahdi, N., Al Muwali, A. & Zaki, Y. (2019). Proposing a framework for evaluating digital creativity in social media and multimedia-based art and design education. Global Journal of Arts Education, 9(2), 48–62. [Google Scholar]
  2. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154-1184. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aydemir, M., Küçük, S., & Karaman, S. (2012). Examining students’ views using tablet pc in distance education. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching. 1 (4), 153-159. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayden, C. & İşgüzar, S. (2016). The study on investigation of relationship between creativity levels and motivations of the university students. Fırat University The Journal of International Social Sciences, 26 (2), 201-218. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baer, J., Kaufman, J. & Gentile, C. (2004). Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to Nonparallel Creative Products. Creativity Research Journal. 16. 113-117. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bastos, F. & Zimmerman, E. (2017). Creativity in art education: Intersecting with design, visual culture, and social justice. Revista GEARTE, Porto Alegre, 4(3), p. 384-401. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bereczki, E. O. & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39,1-27. [Google Scholar]
  8. Black, J. & Browning, K. (2011). Creativity in Digital Art Education Teaching Practices. Art Education, 64(5), 19-34. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown University, (2020). Grading rubrics: sample scales. The Harriet W. Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning https://www.brown.edu/sheridan/teaching-learning-resources/teaching-resources/course-design/classroom-assessment/grading-criteria/rubrics-scales [Google Scholar]
  10. Bulduk, S. (2012). Yaratıcı düşünme ve eğitim [Creative thinking and education]. Psikoloji Çalışmaları/ Studies in Psychology. 21 (0), 75-82. [Google Scholar]
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Akademi [Google Scholar]
  12. Ceylan-Dadakoğlu, S. & Özdemir, A. (2021). Development of analytical rubric for evaluating the effect of mobile design applications on artistic creativity: validity-reliability study. Inonu University Journal of the Graduate School of Education, 8 (16), 64-84. DOI: 10.29129/inujgse.897929 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ceylan-Dadakoğlu, S. & Bakar-Fındıkcı, M. (2020). Perspectives of secondary school students on the use of mobile design applications in art education. The Journal of Social Sciences. 7(44). 145-156. [Google Scholar]
  14. Conrad, S. D. (1990). Toward a phenomenological analysis of artistic creativity. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 21(2), 103-120. [Google Scholar]
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial. New York. [Google Scholar]
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Wolfe, R. (2014). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dolunay, A. & Boyraz, B. (2013). Technology use in artworks produced within the framework of digital arts and impact of internet on exhibiting. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 2(3),109-124. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fox, J. E., & Schirrmacher, R. (2014). Çocuklarda sanat ve yaratcılığın gelişimi [The development of art and creativity in children] (N. Aral & G. Duman, Trans.). Nobel. [Google Scholar]
  19. Freedman, K. (2010). Rethinking creativity: a definition to support contemporary practice. Art Education. 63(2), 8-15. [Google Scholar]
  20. Göktaş, Y., Yıldırım, Z. & Yıldırım, S. (2008). Status of ict in schools of teacher education: deans’ views. Education and Science, 33(149), 30-50. [Google Scholar]
  21. Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1 (1), 3‐14. [Google Scholar]
  22. Han, H.C. (2017). Virtual world and creativity. Journal of Virtual Studies, 8(2), 12-22. [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, H.C, Wright J., S. Martinyuk, & B.Ott (2017). Art Education in the Era of Digital Visual Culture. The International Journal of Arts Education, 15(2), 79-90. [Google Scholar]
  24. Han, H.C. (2019) Visual Culture in Virtual Worlds. In: Trifonas P. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01426-1_29-1  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Hennessey, B.A., Mueller J.S., & Amabile T.M. (2020) Consensual Assessment. In: M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity. pp. 199-205, Academic Press [Google Scholar]
  26. Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Henderson, M. & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: a literature review of the uneasy space of implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2091–2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09912-z  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Keleşoğlu, S. & Kalaycı, N. (2017). On the threshold of the fourth industrial revolution, innovation and education relationship. Creative Drama Journal. 12(1), 69-86. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C. D. & Karakaya, İ. (2014). Öğrenci başarısın belirlenmesi (performansa ve portfolyoya dayalı durum belirleme) [Determining of student success (performance and portfolio based assessment)]. Pegem A. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kırışoğlu, O. T. (2005). Sanatta eğitim görmek öğrenmek yaratmak [Education in Art - seeing, understanding, creating]. Pegem A. [Google Scholar]
  30. Livingston, L. (2010). Teaching creativity in higher education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(2), 59-62. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lowenfeld, V. & Brittain, L. (1964). Creative and Mental Growth. McMillan [Google Scholar]
  32. May, R. (2007). Yaratma Cesareti [Courage to Create]. Metis. [Google Scholar]
  33. Meriçelli, M. ve Uluyol, Ç. (2016). The effect of web supported and mobile supported blended learning environments on students academic achievement and motivation. Journal of Turkish Studies, Volume 11(9), 879-904. [Google Scholar]
  34. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018). Görsel Sanatlar Dersi Öğretim Programı (9.–12. Sınıflar) [Visual Arts Lesson Curriculum (Grades 9-12)]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. [Google Scholar]
  35. Onur, D & Zorlu, T. (2017). Yaratıcılık Kavramı ile İlişkili Kuramsal Yaklaşımlar [Theoretical Approaches towards the Concept of Creativity]. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi/ Journal of the Human and Social Sciences Researches,6(3),1535-1552. [Google Scholar]
  36. Özsoy, V. & Mamur, N. (2019). Görsel Sanatlar Öğrenme ve Öğretim Yaklaşımları [Visual Arts Learning and Teaching Approaches]. Pegem Akademi [Google Scholar]
  37. P21, 2007. Framework for 21st-century learning. Partnership for 21st-century learning. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pelowski, M., Leder, H., & Tinio, P. (2017). Creativity in the Visual Arts. In J. Kaufman, V. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 80-109). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  39. Plucker, J.A., Makel, M.C. & Qian, M. (2019). Assessment of creativity.  In J. C. Kaufman, & Sternberg, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 44-68). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rasmussen, L. J. T., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). Pragmatism. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds), Encyclopedia of Creativity. 382-388, Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42 (7), 305-310. [Google Scholar]
  42. San, İ. (1979).  Sanatta yaratma ve çocukta yaratıcılık [Artistic creativity and children's creativity]. İş Bankası Kültür. [Google Scholar]
  43. San, İ. (2008). Sanat ve Eğitim [Art and education]. Ütopya Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  44. Taşkesen, S. ve Yılmaz, M. (2018). The effect of 3d modeling programs and high definition figure images on the success of pattern course. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 49-55. [Google Scholar]
  45. Taşkesen, S. (2020). Investigation of the Student Opinions Related to Mobile Technology Use in Art Education and its Effect on Their Motivations. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, (84), 585-600. [Google Scholar]
  46. Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-33. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tepecik, A. ve Zor, A. (2014). The effect of web-based computer-aided art education on academic success by constructivist approach. İDİL, 3(14), 51-70. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tinio, P.P.L. (2019). Creativity and aesthetics. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tuğal S.A. (2018). Oluşum süreci içinde dijital sanat [Digital art in the formation process]. Hayalperest Yayınları [Google Scholar]
  50. Türkman, B. (2018). Explicit Instructions & Creativity Judgment. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 8(1), 33-46. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ünalan, H. T. (2016). Eğitim Fakültesi Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi bölümlerinde internet destekli öğrenme ortamlarının oluşturulması. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (1), 130-147 . [Google Scholar]
  52. Von Eye, A., & Mun, E. Y. (2005). Analyzing rater agreement: Manifest variable methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zimmerman, E. (2009). Reconceptualizing the role of creativity in art education theory and practice. Studies in Art Education A Journal of Issues and Research, 50(4), 382-399. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zimmerman, E. (2010). Creativity and art education: a personal journey in four acts. Art Education, 63(5), 84-92. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zor, A., & Tepecik, A. (2015). New approaches in art education and the use of technology. Global Journal of Arts Education, 5 (1), 01-09. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 6 (2)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 6 Issue 2

June 2022

All Articles
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education.
Pen Academic Publishing is a trademark of THDSoft.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC-ND
Electronic Journal Management System. This software was developed in Türkiye. ejournal.gen.tr
Pen Academic Publishing General Publication Policy: