- Al Hashimi, S., Mahdi, N., Al Muwali, A. & Zaki, Y. (2019). Proposing a framework for evaluating digital creativity in social media and multimedia-based art and design education. Global Journal of Arts Education, 9(2), 48–62. [Google Scholar]
- Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154-1184. [Google Scholar]
- Aydemir, M., Küçük, S., & Karaman, S. (2012). Examining students’ views using tablet pc in distance education. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching. 1 (4), 153-159. [Google Scholar]
- Ayden, C. & İşgüzar, S. (2016). The study on investigation of relationship between creativity levels and motivations of the university students. Fırat University The Journal of International Social Sciences, 26 (2), 201-218. [Google Scholar]
- Baer, J., Kaufman, J. & Gentile, C. (2004). Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to Nonparallel Creative Products. Creativity Research Journal. 16. 113-117. [Google Scholar]
- Bastos, F. & Zimmerman, E. (2017). Creativity in art education: Intersecting with design, visual culture, and social justice. Revista GEARTE, Porto Alegre, 4(3), p. 384-401. [Google Scholar]
- Bereczki, E. O. & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39,1-27. [Google Scholar]
- Black, J. & Browning, K. (2011). Creativity in Digital Art Education Teaching Practices. Art Education, 64(5), 19-34. [Google Scholar]
- Brown University, (2020). Grading rubrics: sample scales. The Harriet W. Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning https://www.brown.edu/sheridan/teaching-learning-resources/teaching-resources/course-design/classroom-assessment/grading-criteria/rubrics-scales [Google Scholar]
- Bulduk, S. (2012). Yaratıcı düşünme ve eğitim [Creative thinking and education]. Psikoloji Çalışmaları/ Studies in Psychology. 21 (0), 75-82. [Google Scholar]
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Akademi [Google Scholar]
- Ceylan-Dadakoğlu, S. & Özdemir, A. (2021). Development of analytical rubric for evaluating the effect of mobile design applications on artistic creativity: validity-reliability study. Inonu University Journal of the Graduate School of Education, 8 (16), 64-84. DOI: 10.29129/inujgse.897929 [Google Scholar]
- Ceylan-Dadakoğlu, S. & Bakar-Fındıkcı, M. (2020). Perspectives of secondary school students on the use of mobile design applications in art education. The Journal of Social Sciences. 7(44). 145-156. [Google Scholar]
- Conrad, S. D. (1990). Toward a phenomenological analysis of artistic creativity. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 21(2), 103-120. [Google Scholar]
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial. New York. [Google Scholar]
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Wolfe, R. (2014). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
- Dolunay, A. & Boyraz, B. (2013). Technology use in artworks produced within the framework of digital arts and impact of internet on exhibiting. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 2(3),109-124. [Google Scholar]
- Fox, J. E., & Schirrmacher, R. (2014). Çocuklarda sanat ve yaratcılığın gelişimi [The development of art and creativity in children] (N. Aral & G. Duman, Trans.). Nobel. [Google Scholar]
- Freedman, K. (2010). Rethinking creativity: a definition to support contemporary practice. Art Education. 63(2), 8-15. [Google Scholar]
- Göktaş, Y., Yıldırım, Z. & Yıldırım, S. (2008). Status of ict in schools of teacher education: deans’ views. Education and Science, 33(149), 30-50. [Google Scholar]
- Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1 (1), 3‐14. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H.C. (2017). Virtual world and creativity. Journal of Virtual Studies, 8(2), 12-22. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H.C, Wright J., S. Martinyuk, & B.Ott (2017). Art Education in the Era of Digital Visual Culture. The International Journal of Arts Education, 15(2), 79-90. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H.C. (2019) Visual Culture in Virtual Worlds. In: Trifonas P. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01426-1_29-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Hennessey, B.A., Mueller J.S., & Amabile T.M. (2020) Consensual Assessment. In: M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity. pp. 199-205, Academic Press [Google Scholar]
- Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Henderson, M. & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: a literature review of the uneasy space of implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2091–2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09912-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Keleşoğlu, S. & Kalaycı, N. (2017). On the threshold of the fourth industrial revolution, innovation and education relationship. Creative Drama Journal. 12(1), 69-86. [Google Scholar]
- Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C. D. & Karakaya, İ. (2014). Öğrenci başarısın belirlenmesi (performansa ve portfolyoya dayalı durum belirleme) [Determining of student success (performance and portfolio based assessment)]. Pegem A. [Google Scholar]
- Kırışoğlu, O. T. (2005). Sanatta eğitim görmek öğrenmek yaratmak [Education in Art - seeing, understanding, creating]. Pegem A. [Google Scholar]
- Livingston, L. (2010). Teaching creativity in higher education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(2), 59-62. [Google Scholar]
- Lowenfeld, V. & Brittain, L. (1964). Creative and Mental Growth. McMillan [Google Scholar]
- May, R. (2007). Yaratma Cesareti [Courage to Create]. Metis. [Google Scholar]
- Meriçelli, M. ve Uluyol, Ç. (2016). The effect of web supported and mobile supported blended learning environments on students academic achievement and motivation. Journal of Turkish Studies, Volume 11(9), 879-904. [Google Scholar]
- Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018). Görsel Sanatlar Dersi Öğretim Programı (9.–12. Sınıflar) [Visual Arts Lesson Curriculum (Grades 9-12)]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. [Google Scholar]
- Onur, D & Zorlu, T. (2017). Yaratıcılık Kavramı ile İlişkili Kuramsal Yaklaşımlar [Theoretical Approaches towards the Concept of Creativity]. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi/ Journal of the Human and Social Sciences Researches,6(3),1535-1552. [Google Scholar]
- Özsoy, V. & Mamur, N. (2019). Görsel Sanatlar Öğrenme ve Öğretim Yaklaşımları [Visual Arts Learning and Teaching Approaches]. Pegem Akademi [Google Scholar]
- P21, 2007. Framework for 21st-century learning. Partnership for 21st-century learning. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21 [Google Scholar]
- Pelowski, M., Leder, H., & Tinio, P. (2017). Creativity in the Visual Arts. In J. Kaufman, V. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 80-109). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Plucker, J.A., Makel, M.C. & Qian, M. (2019). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & Sternberg, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 44-68). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, L. J. T., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). Pragmatism. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds), Encyclopedia of Creativity. 382-388, Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42 (7), 305-310. [Google Scholar]
- San, İ. (1979). Sanatta yaratma ve çocukta yaratıcılık [Artistic creativity and children's creativity]. İş Bankası Kültür. [Google Scholar]
- San, İ. (2008). Sanat ve Eğitim [Art and education]. Ütopya Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
- Taşkesen, S. ve Yılmaz, M. (2018). The effect of 3d modeling programs and high definition figure images on the success of pattern course. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 49-55. [Google Scholar]
- Taşkesen, S. (2020). Investigation of the Student Opinions Related to Mobile Technology Use in Art Education and its Effect on Their Motivations. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, (84), 585-600. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-33. [Google Scholar]
- Tepecik, A. ve Zor, A. (2014). The effect of web-based computer-aided art education on academic success by constructivist approach. İDİL, 3(14), 51-70. [Google Scholar]
- Tinio, P.P.L. (2019). Creativity and aesthetics. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Tuğal S.A. (2018). Oluşum süreci içinde dijital sanat [Digital art in the formation process]. Hayalperest Yayınları [Google Scholar]
- Türkman, B. (2018). Explicit Instructions & Creativity Judgment. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 8(1), 33-46. [Google Scholar]
- Ünalan, H. T. (2016). Eğitim Fakültesi Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi bölümlerinde internet destekli öğrenme ortamlarının oluşturulması. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (1), 130-147 . [Google Scholar]
- Von Eye, A., & Mun, E. Y. (2005). Analyzing rater agreement: Manifest variable methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman, E. (2009). Reconceptualizing the role of creativity in art education theory and practice. Studies in Art Education A Journal of Issues and Research, 50(4), 382-399. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman, E. (2010). Creativity and art education: a personal journey in four acts. Art Education, 63(5), 84-92. [Google Scholar]
- Zor, A., & Tepecik, A. (2015). New approaches in art education and the use of technology. Global Journal of Arts Education, 5 (1), 01-09. [Google Scholar]
|