International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education
Abbreviation: IJIAPE | ISSN (Print): 2602-4780 | ISSN (Online): 2602-4489 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiape

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 2024, Vol. 8(3) 130-150

Cyberbullying in Different School Types: Examining Severity, Frequency and Coping Capacities Based on Teachers' Views

Özden Demirkan & Yeşim Kapsıl Çırak

pp. 130 - 150   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2024.1079.2

Published online: September 30, 2024  |   Number of Views: 18  |  Number of Download: 19


Abstract

The aim of the research is to examine the experiences and opinions of teachers in different school types in Northern Cyprus regarding cyberbullying, and to reveal the relationships between the severity, frequency, training and awareness levels of cyberbullying, and their professional and technological competencies in combating it. In line with this purpose, a case study was used as the method since it was aimed to examine teachers' opinions on cyberbullying in a specific context, especially in different school types. The study group of this study consists of 21 teachers working in Northern Cyprus in the fall semester of 2023-2024. However, in order to conduct an in-depth examination in the analysis process, only the opinions of four teachers (Teachers T1, T8, T19 and T20) were taken into consideration. These teachers were determined using the purposive sampling method and were selected according to certain criteria in order to focus on the in-depth analysis of the research on cyberbullying. The data was collected using a semi-structured interview form. The interview questions were structured to address different dimensions of the concept of cyberbullying. Content analysis and thematic analysis methods were used to analyze the obtained data. This study revealed that the severity and frequency of cyberbullying vary by school type, and teachers’ awareness and intervention capacity vary by school type. While the impact of training in private colleges is high, in other school types, lack of training increases the frequency of cases. It is recommended that training be applied and technology-focused, intervention protocols be standardized, and mentoring programs be established. Future studies should examine the effectiveness of training programs and strategies specific to school types in more detail.

Keywords: Cyberbullying, Different School Types, Content Analysis, Thematic Analysis


How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Demirkan, O. & Cirak, Y.K. (2024). Cyberbullying in Different School Types: Examining Severity, Frequency and Coping Capacities Based on Teachers' Views . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 8(3), 130-150. doi: 10.29329/ijiape.2024.1079.2

Harvard
Demirkan, O. and Cirak, Y. (2024). Cyberbullying in Different School Types: Examining Severity, Frequency and Coping Capacities Based on Teachers' Views . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 8(3), pp. 130-150.

Chicago 16th edition
Demirkan, Ozden and Yesim Kapsil Cirak (2024). "Cyberbullying in Different School Types: Examining Severity, Frequency and Coping Capacities Based on Teachers' Views ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 8 (3):130-150. doi:10.29329/ijiape.2024.1079.2.

References
  1. Beran, T., & Li, Q . (2005) Cyber-harrasment: A new method for a behavior. Journal of Educational Comoputing Research, 32(3), 137-153. [Google Scholar]
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021e). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Q., Tang, J., Zhu, Y., & Chan, K. L. (2024). The role of school climate on student disclosure of private information and cyberbullying: a comparison of regular and vocational school students in China. Frontiers in public health, 12, 1336617. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dikmen, M., & Çağlar, A. (2017). Examination of sensitivity of teacher candidates towards cyberbullying in terms of different variables. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 27(2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.346489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Gao, J., Yin, H., & Han, Z. (2024). The effects of victims' reactions on bystanders' perceived severity and willingness to intervene during school bullying: A survey experiment study. Social Psychology of Education, 1-24. [Google Scholar]
  6. Giménez-Gualdo, A.-M., Arnaiz-Sánchez, P., CerezoRamírez, F., & Prodócimo, E. (2018). Teachers' and students' perception about cyberbullying. Intervention and coping strategies in primary and secondary education. Comunicar, 26(56), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3916/c56-2018-03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Mattioni, L., Green, V. A., Hodis, F., & Lynch, T. E. (2016). Perceptions of cyberbullying among teachers and senior management. KAIRARANGA, 17 (1), 56-64. https://www.kairaranga.org.nz [Google Scholar]
  8. Meadows, B., Bergal,J., Hellings,S., Odell, J., Piligan, E., & Howard,C., (2005). The web: The bullys new playground. People, March 21, 152-155. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mitchell, K.J., Ybarra, M. & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The relative importance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency and substance use. Child Maltreatment. 12 (4), 314 -324. [Google Scholar]
  10. Patchin, j. W. & Hinduja ,S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard:A pre-liminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4 (2), 148-169. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rajbhandari, J. &  Rana, K. (2023). Cyberbullying on social media: An analysis of teachers’ unheard voices and coping strategies in Nepal. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 5(2), 95-107. [Google Scholar]
  12. Samara, M., Da Silva Nascimento, B., El Asam, A., Smith, P., Hammuda, S., Morsi, H., & Al-Muhannadi, H. (2020). Practitioners' perceptions, attitudes, and challenges around bullying and cyberbullying. International Journal of Educational Ethics, 12(2), 8-25. [Google Scholar]
  13. SchoolSafety.gov. (2024). Bullying and cyberbullying prevention strategies and resources . US Department of Education. Retrieved on 24 October from: https://www.schoolsafety.gov/sites/default/files/2024-09/SchoolSafety.gov_Bullying%20and%20Cyberbullying%20Prevention%20Strategies%20and%20Resources_508.pdf [Google Scholar]
  14. Siddiqui, S., & Schultze-Krumbholz, A. (2023). Successful and emerging cyberbullying prevention programs: a narrative review of seventeen interventions applied worldwide. Societies, 13(9), 212. [Google Scholar]
  15. Styron, R.A., Bonner, J.L., Styron, J.L., Bridgeforth, J., & Martin, C. (2016). Are teacher and principal candidates prepared to address student cyberbullying. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 19(1), 19-28. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tanrikulu, I. (2018). Cyberbullying prevention and intervention programs in schools: A systematic review. School Psychology International, 39 (1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318754612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Thompson, R. (2022). Cyberbullying intervention – Practical considerations for teachers . Teacher Magazine.https://www.teachermagazine.com/au_en/articles/cyberbullying-intervention-practical-considerations-for-teachers [Google Scholar]
  18. Tosun, N., & Akcay, H. (2022). Cyberbullying/cyber-victimization status, cyberbullying awareness, and combat strategies of administrators and teachers of pre-school education institutions. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 6 (1), 41–73. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Tunca, G., & Geleri, G. (2020). Investigation of cyberbullying and victimization among adolescents in terms of school types . Journal of Social Sciences Research , 9(1), 10-18. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vandebosch ,H., & Clemput, K.V. (2008) Defining cyberbullying: A Qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. Cyberpsychology and Behavior . 11 (4), 499-503. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ybarra, M. & Diener-West, M., Leaf, P.J. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harrasment and school bullying: İmplications for school intervention . Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 42- 50. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ybarra, M., & Mitchell, K. (2004a). Online agressor / targets, agressors and targets: A comparison of associated youth charecteristics. Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45 (47), 1308-316. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ybarra, M., & Mitchell, K. (2004 b ). Youth engaging in online harrasment: Association with caregiver-child relationships, internet use and perso nal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 319-336. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ybarra, M., & Mitchell, K. (2007). Prevelance and frequency of internet harrasment instigation: İmplications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health. 41, 189-195 . [Google Scholar]
  25. Yıldırım, A. F. & Yazgan, Ç.Ü. (2022). Saldırganlığın Dijital Ortamda Yeniden Üretimi: Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Saldırganlık ve Siber Zorbalık/Mağduriyet Deneyimlerinin İncelenmesi. TRT Akademi, 7 (15), 648-675. DOI: 10.37679/trta.1110739 [Google Scholar]
  26. Yot-Domínguez, C., Guzmán Franco, M.D., & Duarte Hueros, A. (2019). Trainee teachers' perceptions on cyberbullying in educational contexts. Social Sciences, 8 (1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Zhu, C., Huang, S., Evans, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 634909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]