International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education
Abbreviation: IJIAPE | ISSN (Print): 2602-4780 | ISSN (Online): 2602-4489 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiape

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 2022, Vol. 6(3) 173-189

A Qualitative Research on the Characteristics of Senior Education Administrators

Özlem Akı & Hüseyi̇n Erkul

pp. 173 - 189   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2022.473.4

Published online: September 30, 2022  |   Number of Views: 71  |  Number of Download: 299


Abstract

Today, with the effect of the globalization vision, the management systems and policies of the states have changed and continuous development has become a necessity. Education policies are also frequently reviewed in order to keep up with these developments and changes, and education systems are arranged according to these changes. Therefore, the most important question is; “How can we manage the education system more effectively?” is in the form.

In this process, where international competition has increased, national borders have virtually disappeared and education has become global, the decision-making and problem-solving roles of senior education administrators have also gained importance. The characteristics of senior education administrators who have an important role in the training of qualified manpower, are decisive both in the efficient, effective, qualified and rational use of scarce resources and in the quality of the provision of education services.

Behavioral and personal characteristics, task awareness, education, belief in science, intellectual, artistic, managerial characteristics, leadership characteristics, strategic thinking and environmental awareness of senior education administrators are an important component in the successful management of educational institutions.

In the research; it is aimed to determine the managerial characteristics of the administrators who work as senior education administrators in educational institutions and their reflection on the management process. In the research, the "descriptive method" was used, which is based on gathering the information on the subject and determining the problems and making applicable inferences for the solution of these problems. The research data were obtained by interview technique with senior education administrators, coded in accordance with the purpose of the research, interrelated data were brought together, processed in the maxqda program with content analysis and the results were interpreted and the contribution of the features that should be found in senior education administrators to adapt to changing environmental conditions and change has been examined.

Keywords: Senior Tier, Education Administrator, Training Senior Education Administrators, Senior Education Administrator Training Policies


How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Aki, O. & Erkul, H. (2022). A Qualitative Research on the Characteristics of Senior Education Administrators . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 6(3), 173-189. doi: 10.29329/ijiape.2022.473.4

Harvard
Aki, O. and Erkul, H. (2022). A Qualitative Research on the Characteristics of Senior Education Administrators . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 6(3), pp. 173-189.

Chicago 16th edition
Aki, Ozlem and Huseyi̇n Erkul (2022). "A Qualitative Research on the Characteristics of Senior Education Administrators ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 6 (3):173-189. doi:10.29329/ijiape.2022.473.4.

References
  1. Agarwal, P.K. (2018). Public administration challenges in the world of AI and bots. Public   Administration Review, 78(6), 917-921. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akbaba-Altun, S. and Gürer, M.D. (2008). School administrators’ perceptions of their roles regarding information technology classrooms. Eurasian Journal of Educational          Research, 33, 35-54. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bogdanowicz, M., Burgelman, J. C., Centeno, C., Gourova, E., Carat, G. (2003). Factors of regional/national success in information society developments: Information society        strategies for candidate countries. First Monday. [Google Scholar]
  4. Çelenk, S. (2002). Geleceğin Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesinde Bir Model Önerisi. 21.           Yüzyıl Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi Sempozyumu (16-17 Mayıs 2002),  s. 65-        81, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları Yayın No: 191. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gözübüyük, Ş. (2011). Yönetim Hukuku, s.1., ISBN: 9789757425212, Turhan Kitabevi,      Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hansen, J. A. and Tummers, L. (2020). A Systematic Review Of Field Experiments İn Public           Administration. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 921-931. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jitsoonthornchaikul, M. (2018). The New Era of Learning. In ASEAN/Asian Academic Society          International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 463-468). [Google Scholar]
  8. Özden, Y. (2005). Eğitim ve Okul Yöneticiliği El Kitabı. 2. Baskı, s. 116-118,        ISBN:1000531010149, T.C. Milli Eğitim   Bakanlığı Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  9. Perraton, H. (2020). A theory for distance education. In Distance education: International    perspectives (pp. 34-45). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  10. Seçtim, H. ve Erkul, H., (2020). Yönetim Yaklaşımları Üzerine Kuramsal Bir          Değerlendirme. Management and Political Sciences Review, 2(1), 18-50. [Google Scholar]