International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education
Abbreviation: IJIAPE | ISSN (Print): 2602-4780 | ISSN (Online): 2602-4489 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiape

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 2022, Vol. 6(4) 235-248

Evaluation of Teacher Appointment and Relocation Principles in the Perspective of Current Regulations: An Example of Apology/Excuse Group Appointment

Davut Atmaca

pp. 235 - 248   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2022.503.3

Published online: December 31, 2022  |   Number of Views: 16  |  Number of Download: 32


Abstract

In recent years, the demands of teachers working in public institutions affiliated to the Ministry of National Education to assign excuses have become quite controversial. It is seen that the procedures and principles regarding ensuring the family integrity of teachers come to the fore, especially in the intra-provincial appointments of disabled groups. In this context, the aim of the research is to propose solutions to the problems experienced by systematically revealing the principles of apology determination of teachers working in the public sector. Case study, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study. According to the results of the research, teachers who choose in the second stage of the provincial disability group assignment are faced with the warning "There is no vacant quota in your field". The appointment of teachers who are more than the norm staff before the appointment of excuses causes the teachers who request to assign excuses to experience grievances. In particular, the demands of the teachers to make excuses within the province cannot be met by the administration due to the insufficient number of service points and the limited quota. In recent years, the Ministry of National Education has been applying a "provincial order" for excuse assignments made outside the province. The fact that contracted teachers do not apply for an excuse assignment before completing three years creates grievances. Not counting the lack of education among the excuses prevents teachers from receiving postgraduate education. Accordingly, it is thought that introducing a "neighborhood order" for teachers who have been working in the same province for six years or more will prevent congestion in appointments. In the appointment of the provincial apology, all districts within the province should be opened under the pretext of family unity.

Keywords: Apology Group Assignment, Teacher, MEB, Regulation, District Order


How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Atmaca, D. (2022). Evaluation of Teacher Appointment and Relocation Principles in the Perspective of Current Regulations: An Example of Apology/Excuse Group Appointment . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 6(4), 235-248. doi: 10.29329/ijiape.2022.503.3

Harvard
Atmaca, D. (2022). Evaluation of Teacher Appointment and Relocation Principles in the Perspective of Current Regulations: An Example of Apology/Excuse Group Appointment . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 6(4), pp. 235-248.

Chicago 16th edition
Atmaca, Davut (2022). "Evaluation of Teacher Appointment and Relocation Principles in the Perspective of Current Regulations: An Example of Apology/Excuse Group Appointment ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 6 (4):235-248. doi:10.29329/ijiape.2022.503.3.

References
  1. Ada, Ş., Durdağı, A., Ayık, A., Yıldırım, İ. & Yalçın, S. (2013). Öğretmenlerin Motivasyon Etkenleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(3), 151-166. [Google Scholar]
  2. Atmaca, D., Toygur, H. & Çamurcu, H. (2022). Güncel Yönetmelik Perspektifinde Öğretmen Yer Değiştirme Esaslarının Değerlendirilmesi: “Hizmet Puanı” Kriteri Örneği. Ulusal Eğitim Akademisi Dergisi, 6(1), 68-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.32960/uead.1049050 [Google Scholar]
  3. Başaran, İ. E. (1996). Türkiye Eğitim Sistemi. Ankara: Yargıcı Matbaası. [Google Scholar]
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, K. E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dresel, M., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Motivation. In, Hall, N. C., & Goetz, T. (Eds.), Emotion, Motivation, and Self-Regulation: A Handbook For Teachers (p. 57-122). Bradford, GBR: Emerald Insight. [Google Scholar]
  6. MEB. (2011). Teachers' Handicap-Based Relocation Guide. http://personel.meb.gov.tr/kilavuzlar/2011/Ocak adresinden 12.04.2022 reached on. [Google Scholar]
  7. MEB. (2015). Teacher Appointment and Relocation Regulations. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr adresinden 31.03.2022 reached on. [Google Scholar]
  8. MEB. (2017). Teacher Strategy Paper 2017-2023. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr at 10.04.2022 reached on. [Google Scholar]
  9. MEB. (2022). Relocation Guide Due to Excuses and Other Reasons. Retrieved from http://personel.meb.gov.tr on 31.03.2022. [Google Scholar]
  10. Memişoğlu, S. P., Yılmaz, D. Ç., İsmetoğlu, M. & Erbaş, H. (2015). Öğretmenlerin Zorunlu Yer Değiştirmesi Uygulamasına Yönelik Lise Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 10(11), 1121-1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8479 [Google Scholar]
  11. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel Araştırma Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber. (Çev. S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  12. Özoğlu, M. (2015). Mobility-Related Teacher Turnover and The Unequal Distribution of Experienced Teachers ın Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(4), 891-909. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Öztürk, H. İ. (2002). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş. Çanakkale: HD Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  14. Şahin, A. & Doğan, M. (2020). Öğretmenlerin Yer Değiştirme İstekleri: Nedenler ve Tercihler. Full Texts of the 12th International Education Community Symposium. 05-07 July 2020 (pp. 522-532), Online Environment: Turkey. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/ [Google Scholar]
  15. Şahin, İ., Beycioğlu, K., Sincar, M. & Çıkrıkçı, F. (2016). Öğretmen Rotasyon (Zorunlu Yer Değiştirme) Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 22(2), 267-287. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ugurlu, C. T. & Özdemir, Ö. S. (2021). Özel Okulda Mutlu Bir Öğretmen Olmak. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 64-84. [Google Scholar]
  17. Uygun, S. (2012). Basında Öğretmen Sorunları. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 42(194), 72-91. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yavuzdoğan, S. (2014). Danıştay’ın Naklen Atamalarda Aile Birliğinin Korunması Amacıyla Eş Durmunun Gözetilmesi İlkesine Yaklaşımı. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 0(19), 415-446. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, A. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yılmaz, K., Altınkurt, Y., Karaköse, T. & Erol, E. (2012). Okul Yöneticilerine Uygulanan Zorunlu Yer Değiştirme Uygulaması Hakkında Okul Yöneticilerinin ve Öğretmenlerin Görüşleri. e-International Jurnal of Education Resarch, 3(3), 65-83.  [Google Scholar]