International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education
Abbreviation: IJIAPE | ISSN (Print): 2602-4780 | ISSN (Online): 2602-4489 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiape

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 2023, Vol. 7(3) 114-136

Evaluation of Family Relations in Custody Cases: Adapting The Structured Assessment Form for Children to Turkish Culture

Ceren Baydemir & Ercan Kocayörük

pp. 114 - 136   |  DOI:

Published online: October 11, 2023  |   Number of Views: 21  |  Number of Download: 64


The main goal of the study was to adapt the Structured Child Assessment Tool for Family Relationships (SCARF) developed by Strachan et al. (2010) to Turkish culture and to develop an assessment tool for the evaluators working in custody cases to make a standardized assessment in child interviews. The study involved 130 children between the ages of 4 and 14 who were included in custody cases. For the reliability of the assessment tool, Cronbach's Alpha coefficients were computed for dimensions and sub-dimensions by age and examined with the test-retest method. For construct validity, Spearman Correlation Analysis was conducted for the correlation between the scores given by the child and the evaluator to the parents. Independent samples t-test was applied to specify whether there was a statistically significant difference between the scores given by children to their parents. In the research, a significant positive relationship was established in the scores given to the mother in both assessment tools for construct validity. In the scores given to the father, a significant relationship was found in all dimensions except Negative Parenting and Co-Parenting (p<0.01). The comparison of the scores given by the child to the parents did not reveal any significant difference between the scores of the mother and father in all dimensions and sub-dimensions (p>0.05). As a consequence, it was established that the SCARF is a valid, reliable, and appropriate assessment tool for Turkish culture that can be used by the evaluator in child with custody cases.

Keywords: Divorce, Custody, Child custody, Evaluator, Family relationships

How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Baydemir, C. & Kocayoruk, E. (2023). Evaluation of Family Relations in Custody Cases: Adapting The Structured Assessment Form for Children to Turkish Culture . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 7(3), 114-136. doi: 10.29329/ijiape.2023.605.2

Baydemir, C. and Kocayoruk, E. (2023). Evaluation of Family Relations in Custody Cases: Adapting The Structured Assessment Form for Children to Turkish Culture . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 7(3), pp. 114-136.

Chicago 16th edition
Baydemir, Ceren and Ercan Kocayoruk (2023). "Evaluation of Family Relations in Custody Cases: Adapting The Structured Assessment Form for Children to Turkish Culture ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 7 (3):114-136. doi:10.29329/ijiape.2023.605.2.

  1. Anthony, E. J. & Bene, E. (1957). A technique for the objective assessment of the child’s family relations. Journal of Mental Science, 103, 541–555. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aydos, S. ve Köksal Akyol, A. (2020). The Process About the Custody Decisions: What Are Experts Thinking? What Are Experts Doing?. Journal of Society & Social Work, 31(3), 904-930. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilici, A. B. (2014). The Psycho-social effects of a divorce process on children. Cumhuriyet Theology Journal, 18(2), 79-11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler, I., Scanlan, L., Robinson, M., Douglas, G. & Murch, M. (2002). Children's involvement in their parents' divorce: Implications for practice. Children & Society, 16(2), 89-102. [Google Scholar]
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Data analysis handbook for social sciences statistics, research design spss applications and interpretation. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  6. Can, Y. & Aksu, N. B. (2016). Women during and after the divorce process. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(58). [Google Scholar]
  7. Çınar E. H, (2015). Determination of the relationship between parents' perception of marital conflicts and anxiety levels of 9-12 year old children whose parents are in the process of divorce, İzmir province case, Unpublished Master's Thesis. Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Family Education and Counseling, İzmir. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hovens, J. G., Wiersma, J. E., Giltay, E. J., Van Oppen, P., Spinhoven, P., Penninx, B. W. &         Zitman, F. G. (2010). Childhood life events and childhood trauma in adult patients with depressive, anxiety and comorbid disorders vs. controls. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 122(1), 66-74. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiménez-Etcheverría, P. & Palacios, J. (2020).Psychological adjustment,attachment difficulties, and perceptions of family relationships in adopted and institution-reared          children: The case of Chile. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105102. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones, C.M. (2019). Stay-at-home Father Families: Family Functioning and Experiences of Non-traditional Gender Roles (Doctoral thesis), Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). Multivariate statistical techniques with SPSS. Asil Publishing Distribution, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  12. Karadağ, F. & Özdemir, D. F. (2021). Evaluation of cases sent from family courts to university hospital during contentious divorce/custody process. Turkish Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 24(1), 99-108. [Google Scholar]
  13. Karaman, M. (2018). Factors affecting the custody opinion of experts working in family courts. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Social Work, Istanbul. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kayma, D. (2023). Custody Evaluation. Süleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 14(38), 474-495. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kesen, N. F., & Bilgin, Ö. (2023). Expertise practices of social workers in the judicial system. Turkish journal of Forensic Medicine, 37(2), 39-55. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kılıç, Ç. (2013). In Service Education Needs of Family Court Social Workers. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 14(2), 273-290. [Google Scholar]
  17. Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F. & Barcus, E. H. (2000). The use of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Family Court Review, 38(3), 312-340. [Google Scholar]
  18. Özdamar, K. (2015). Statistical data analysis with package programs (Volume 1).  Nisan Bookstore, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  19. Parkin, A. (2001). The Bene‐Anthony Family Relations Test revisited: Directions in the assessment of children's perceptions of family relations. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74(3), 323-349. [Google Scholar]
  20. Quinnell, F. A. and Bow, J. N. (2001). Psychological tests used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(4), 491-501. [Google Scholar]
  21. Skoczeń, I., Cieciuch, J., Oud, J. H. & Welzen, K. (2015). Development and validation of the computerized family relations test for children. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1687. [Google Scholar]
  22. Spremo, M. (2020). Children and divorce. Psychiatria Danubina, 32(3), 353-359. [Google Scholar]
  23. Stahl, P. M. (2010). Conducting child custody evaluations: From basic to complex issues. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  24. Strachan, A., Lund, M. E. & Garcia, J. A. (2010). Assessing Children's Perceptions of Family Relationships: An Interactive Instrument for Use in Custody Disputes. Journal of Child Custody, 7(3), 192-216. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tatlılıoğlu, K., & Demirel, N. (2016). Divorce Phenomenon As A Social Reality: A Social Psychological Evaluation. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 4(22), 59-73. [Google Scholar]
  26. Turkish Statistical Institute (2022). Marriage and divorce statistics. Access 05 September 2023, [Google Scholar]
  27. Üner Altuntaş, G. E. (2010). Evaluation of the evaluator reports in the custody decisions given between 2005-2007 in Istanbul Fatih Courthouse 1st Family Court. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Istanbul University Institute of Forensic Medicine, Istanbul. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zorbaz, S. ve Korkut Owen, F. (2013). Developing Family Relationship Scale for Children. Turkish Psychological Counseling & Guidance Journal, 4(39). [Google Scholar]