International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education
Abbreviation: IJIAPE | ISSN (Print): 2602-4780 | ISSN (Online): 2602-4489 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiape

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 2022, Vol. 6(3) 157-172

Occupational Cynicism According to the Opinions of Teachers

Beli̇s Feyza Güllü & Adil Çoruk

pp. 157 - 172   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2022.473.3

Published online: September 30, 2022  |   Number of Views: 12  |  Number of Download: 41


Abstract

Cynicism, which is defined as the critical and insulting attitudes towards life, people and institutions depending on the negative experiences and feelings of the people, can be exhibited by the employees in the organizations. Cynicism consists of individual and organizational dimensions. Occupational cynicism is a type of organizational cynicism and can be expressed as emotional fatigue, disregard for the profession, thinking that the profession is overwhelming, not rewarding, not worth for the effort, having a negative perspective, attitude and feelings towards one's profession. It is the reflection of these attitudes and feelings critically. Emotions, attitudes and behaviors of teachers towards their profession can positively or negatively affect the climate of the educational organizations they are in, and therefore the educational outcomes. In the literature, there are studies on organizational cynicism for teachers. However, studies examining teachers' perceptions of occupational cynicism seem to be limited. Therefore, it can be said that examining teachers’ opinions towards occupational cynicism is important. For this reason, the purpose of this study is to examine teachers' opinions of cynicism towards their profession. The study was designed with phenomenology, one of the qualitative research methods, and maximum variation sampling method was used to determine the study group. The study group consists of teachers working in public schools. The data were obtained by collecting with a semi-structured interview form. Descriptive analysis of the obtained data was made. The study was evaluated around four main themes. These are teachers' perceptions of occupational cynicism, causes of occupational cynicism, results of occupational cynicism and precautions to reduce occupational cynicism. According to the results of the study, the attitudes and behaviors towards occupational cynicism are not worth the effort, the thought that the teaching profession is worthless, the idea that professional rights are limited, and negative attitudes and behaviors such as reluctance. The labor which is not valued enough, unnecessary workload other than education and training, financial and family problems, lack of sufficient legal basis to protect the rights of teachers, problems with students and parents, injustice and management styles within the institution are some of the main causes for occupational cynicism according to the participants. Decline the quality of the education-teaching process, internal conflicts, decrease in school commitment, psychosomatic problems, communication problems, decreased professional commitment and resignation are some of the institutional and individual consequences of occupational cynicism for participants. According to the participants, establishing justice-based education policies, encouraging professional development, strengthening school culture, participating in personal and professional development activities, changing institutions, staying away from the work environment for a short time are some of the precautions listed to reduce occupational cynicism.

Keywords: Cynicism, Occupational Cynicism, Teacher


How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Gullu, B.F. & Coruk, A. (2022). Occupational Cynicism According to the Opinions of Teachers . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 6(3), 157-172. doi: 10.29329/ijiape.2022.473.3

Harvard
Gullu, B. and Coruk, A. (2022). Occupational Cynicism According to the Opinions of Teachers . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education, 6(3), pp. 157-172.

Chicago 16th edition
Gullu, Beli̇s Feyza and Adil Coruk (2022). "Occupational Cynicism According to the Opinions of Teachers ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education 6 (3):157-172. doi:10.29329/ijiape.2022.473.3.

References
  1. Akbas Tuna, A., & Turkmendag, Z. (2020). Remote Working Practices and the Factors Affecting Work Motivation During The Covid-19 Pandemic Period. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 12 (3), 3246-3260. [Google Scholar]
  2. Atmaca, T., & Ontas, T. (2014). Qualitative Research on Parental Violence against Teachers. Anatolian Journal of Educational Leadership and Instruction, 2 (1), 47-62. [Google Scholar]
  3. Can, N., & Ozsu, M. (2021). Teachers' Views on Organizational Cynicism. Journal of Social Sciences of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, 18 (3), 1510-1526. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cankaya, I. (1996). Application of Barter Theory by School Administration. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 8 (8), 539-546. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cimili Gok, EB, & Unal, CG (2021). Organizational Cynicism Perceptions, Causes and Organizational Results According to the Opinions of Secondary School Teachers. Asian Studies-Academic Social Studies, 5 (16), 95-106. [Google Scholar]
  6. Culha, A., & Kaya, A. (2021). The Relationship Between Teachers' Perceptions of Organizational Cynicism and Organizational Silence. Turkish Scientific Researches Journal, 6 (2), 415-430. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dean Jr, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational Cynism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341-352. [Google Scholar]
  8. Duman, N., Sak, R., & Sahin Sak, IT (2020). Examination of Teachers' Job Burnout Level and Organizational Cynicism Attitudes. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 17 (1), 1098-1127. [Google Scholar]
  9. Erkal, EA, & Naktiyok, A. (2021). The Effect of Organizational Cyncism on Burnout in the Context of Presenteeism: Ataturk University HELITAM Example. Journal of Life Economics, 8 (4), 443-454. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hatipoglu, A., & Kavas, E. (2016). The Effects of Parents Approach on Teacher Performance. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 5 (4), 1012-1034. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kalagan, G., & Guzeller, CO (2010). The Organizational Cynicism Levels of the Teachers. Pamukkale University Journal of Education (27), 83-97. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kizgin, Y., & Dalgin, T. (2012). Atribution Theory: Attribution Differences of Students Between Success and Failure Circumstances. ZKU Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (15), 61-77. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mete, Y. A. (2013). Relationship Between Organizational Cynicism and Ethical Leadership Behavior: A Study At Higher Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 476-483. [Google Scholar]
  14. Metin, I. U. (2020). Examination of Level of Organizational Justice, Nepotism Behavior of School Principals and Organizational Cynicism According to Teachers' Perceptions in Schools: Zonguldak Province Case. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 8 , 290-302. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ozgenel, M., & Hidiroglu, A. (2019). An Attitude Resulting According to Leadership Styles: Organizational Cynicism. Kirsehir Education Faculty Journal, 20 (2), 1003-1043. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pelit, N., & Pelit, E. (2014). Two main cancer-causing factors in organizations: Mobbing and organizational cynicism. Detail Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  17. Porter, LW, & Lawler, EE (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: RD Irwin. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sagir, T., & Oguz, E. (2012). Developing of Organizational Cynicism Scala for Teachers. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9 (2), 1094-1106. [Google Scholar]
  19. Samdan, T., & Atanur Baskan, G. (2019). An Analysis of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Cynicism According to the Perceptions of Teachers. PAU Journal of Education, 47 , 17-40. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sayan, H. (2020). Assessment of Faculty Members' Views on Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic Process. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology, 11 (42), 100-121. [Google Scholar]
  21. Senses, B. (2018). Organizational Cynicism: A Behavior Shaping According to Leadership Styles. International Journal of Leadership Studies: Theory and Practice, 1 (1), 13-28. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tufan, A., & Erhan, S. E. (2021). Investigation of the Effects of Physical Education Teachers' Perceptions of Organizational Justice on Organizational Cynicism Attitudes. International Journal of Exercise Psychology, 3 (1), 18-25. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. Oxford, England: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  24. Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work. In MB Staw, & LL Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews (pp. 1- 74). US: Elsevier Science-JAI. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2018). Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences (11th Edition). Ankara: Seckin. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yuksel, I., & Bilgin, U. (2021). Examination of The Relationship Between Physical Education Teachers' Perceptions of Organizational Cynicism and Attitudes Towards The Profession and Wage Satisfaction. Anatolia Sport Research, 2 (2), 33-45. [Google Scholar]